Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) Findings in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

Authors

  • Ayesha Akhtar Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi - Pakistan
  • Syed Ali Abbas Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi - Pakistan
  • Yameena Noman Khan Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi - Pakistan
  • Ali Mala Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi - Pakistan
  • Namra Tanveer Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi - Pakistan
  • Gohar Fatima Liaquat National Hospital, Katachi - Pakistan

Keywords:

CTPA, Pulmonary Embolism, Lymphadenopathy, Consolidation

Abstract

Background A workup should be initiated if certain symptoms, even general ones, that are not explained by another illness raise the possibility of pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary imaging procedure that is advised for an individual with suspected pulmonary embolism is computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This diagnostic tool (CTPA) is much more sensitive than a standard chest X-ray in identifying a variety of abnormalities that a basic chest X-ray film may easily overlook. Objective This study aims to determine the incidence of pulmonary embolism and any other abnormalities noted on CTPA in patients who were suspected to have PE on clinical grounds and underwent CTPA. Methodology This is a retrospective investigation conducted from January 2020 to December 2022 at Dr. Ziauddin University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Results This study involved 194 patients in total, of which 99 (51%) were men.  CTPA confirmed PE in 38(19.6%) patients of those with clinical suspicion. Other CTPA findings included atelectasis 59(30.4%), pleural effusion 54(27.8%), pulmonary fibrosis 35(18%), lymphadenopathy 32(16.5%) and consolidation 61(31.4%). Granulomas were frequently discovered in people who were elderly. Conclusion: CTPA is a very useful tool in identifying patients with PE and may also show findings other than PE which may explain the symptoms or establish other diagnosis. Also, certain incidental findings may necessitate further work up or investigation.

References

Abbas SA, Akber A, Ahmed Z. (2018). Incidental findings on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography in patients with suspected Pulmonary Embolism and normal chest radiograph. Pak J Chest Med. 2018;23(2):39–43.

Ambesh P, Kapoor A, Kumar S, et al; The dilemma of the "ischemic-looking" electrocardiogram: Pulmonary embolism or acute coronary syndrome? Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):89-91. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_40_18.

Saro G, Campo J, Hernandez M, Anta M, Olmos J, González-Macías J, et al. Diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a report from the real world. Postgrad Med J. 1999;75(883):285-8.

Hur DJ, Sugeng L. Non-invasive multimodality cardiovascular imaging of the right heart and pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:24.

Henschke CI, Mateescu I, Yankelevitz DF. Changing practice patterns in the workup of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1995;107(4):940-5.

Stein P, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan R, Hales C, Saltzman H, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85(2):462-8.

Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Valli N, Couffinhal T, Raherisson C, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation—perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;174(4):1041-7.

Trowbridge RL, Araoz PA, Gotway MB, Bailey RA, Auerbach AD. The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. The American journal of medicine. 2004;116(2):84-90.

Perrier A, Roy P-M, Aujesky D, Chagnon I, Howarth N, Gourdier A-L, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. The American journal of medicine. 2004;116(5):291-9.

Sostman HD, Ravin CE, Sullivan DC, Mills SR, Glickman MG, Dorfman G. Use of pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: influence of scintigraphic diagnosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1982;139(4):673-7.

Stein P, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan R, Hales C, Saltzman H, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85(2):462-8.

Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing; NICE Guidance (March 2020)

Alhassan S, Sayf AA, Arsene C, Krayem H. Suboptimal implementation of diagnostic algorithms and overuse of computed tomography-pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Thorac Med. 2016;11(4):254-60.

Molaee S, Ghanaati H, Safavi E, Foroumandi M, Peiman S. Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography for Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Use or Overuse. Iran J Radiol. 2015;12(3):e22383.

Van Es J, Douma RA, Schreuder SM, Middeldorp S, Kamphuisen PW, Gerdes VEA, et al. Clinical Impact of Findings Supporting an Alternative Diagnosis on CT Pulmonary Angiography in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Chest. 2013;144(6):1893-9.

Van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, Beenen LF, van Bemmel T, van Es J, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. The Lancet. 2017;390(10091):289-97.

Chen Z, Deblois S, Toporowicz K, Boldeanu I, Francoeur M-O, Sadouni M, et al. Yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12:1-4.

Moores LK, Jackson Jr WL, Shorr AF, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;141(11):866-74.

Shujaat A, Shapiro JM, Eden E. Utilization of CT pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism in a major urban emergency department. Pulmonary Medicine. 2013;2013.

Adams DM, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Snow GL, et al. Adherence to PIOPED II investigators' recommendations for computed tomography pulmonary angiography. The American Journal of Medicine. 2013;126(1):36-42.

Crichlow A, Cuker A, Mills AM. Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2012;19(11):1219-26.

Cereser L, Bagatto D, Girometti R, Como G, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M. Chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic yield and proportion of other clinically relevant findings. La Radiologia Medica. 2010;116(2):219-29.

David S, Beddy P, Babar J, Devaraj A. Evolution of CT pulmonary angiography: referral patterns and diagnostic yield in 2009 compared with 2006. Acta Radiologica. 2012;53(1):39-43.

Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, Parker LA, et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(21):1961-5.

Van Strijen MJ, Bloem JL, de Monyé W, Kieft GJ, Pattynama PM, van den Berg-Huijsmans A, et al. Helical computed tomography and alternative diagnosis in patients with excluded pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(11):2449-56.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

How to Cite

Akhtar, A. ., Abbas, S. A., Khan, Y. N. ., Mala, A., Tanveer, N., & Fatima, G. (2023). Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) Findings in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Pakistan Journal of Chest Medicine, 29(4), 486–494. Retrieved from http://pjcm.net/index.php/pjcm/article/view/784

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)